We make SaaS for two month now the marketing cofounder wants more shares
3 months back, me and one of my acquaintance started working on a SaaS idea. It was mostly an already existing idea (a knowledge-base system) but my cofounder convinced me that it's still worth building because he knows there are potential customers and it might be a good way to get started with SaaS in general. So I took care of all-things-tech and put up an MVP in roughly two months. We ran campaigns (my cofounder knows multiple potential customers and is well resourced in that sense) but haven't had a paying customer yet (might be due to COVID, but of course the product might be the cause as well).
I don't agree with what your cofounder is trying to do in giving you a lesser share. Yes the marketing is intence but the technical stuff is not a trivial matter either, I am not sure of the hours that have been put in by everyone to make him think this.
But the way that reads is you got your part of the job done (the tech) and his part the (marketing) hasn't brought in anything. But he wants you to take a lesser share?
Unfortunately, this will probably leave a sour taste in someone's mouth by the end of this and I may be a bit bias as I am a techie at heart.
I have 2 videos here that may help you, 1 is about shares and dilution https://youtu.be/FVN3rhgeOwg and another is an interview with a startup solicitor https://youtu.be/5yhXecq3aCQ they may be able to help in some way and shed some light onto your situation.
The question in full:
I have a question about founder equity-split.
3 months back, me and one of my acquaintance started working on a SaaS idea. It was mostly an already existing idea (a knowledge-base system) but my cofounder convinced me that it's still worth building because he knows there are potential customers and it might be a good way to get started with SaaS in general.
So I took care of all-things-tech and put up an MVP in roughly two months. We ran campaigns (my cofounder knows multiple potential customers and is well resourced in that sense) but haven't had a paying customer yet (might be due to COVID, but of course the product might be the cause as well).
Now fast forward one month, we are trying to adapt our solution for the Shopify ecosystem, and my cofounder introduced me to another guy who's working with Shopify app companies for the last 3-4 years. His proposal is to onboard him as a cofounder, which I'm also happy to, but now the big question for me is,
"How should the equity be divided among three or us?"
I proposed it to be split half between me and my first co-founder, and slightly less to the newly onboarded guy. But my co-founder doesn't seem to agree with equal split, he thinks I should have a lesser equity share and said that that's usually the case with other SaaS companies too because SaaS is marketing intensive.
I was wondering if someone is aware of what the right split could be (or what's the usual trend) and can share that knowledge here.
PS: I know, I should've talked all this out in the very beginning, that's a mistake on my part.
Sounds like you should stick with your previous suggestion. The concept that the marketing co-founder should get more equity than the technical co-founder is laughable. Especially with a SOFTWARE as a service startup. I could see it in a marketing firm but not a software startup. Co-Founders are equal partners that's why theres a 'co' in the title. The only time you should change from equal split is the following scenarios:
One partner has done a TON of previous work on the startup
One founder invested money in the startup
One founder is currently working a lot more on the startup
As a side note I find it pretty ironic that your 'marketing intensive' co-founder suggests he should get more equity when he has yet to get a single customer and you singly-highhandedly created the mvp. What happens when you realize this co-founder can't actually do marketing at all and he's got more equity than you?
Question asked by
June 30, 2020, 4:31:25 PM
Related Picture Note Cards
The process for a process to gain access to market
A product must gain access to a market and then bought by a customer who is comparison shopping in a safe place. The market validate the quality and safety of the product.
Steps to turn an idea into a product innovation
What are the steps to turn an idea into an innovation? there are at least the following steps. The idea must be turned into a product, and the product must enter the market. In the market, the target audience will examine the artifact - if they buy, then the product becomes a merchandise.
Startup failures - why they fail?
A first time entrepreneur always under estimate the difficulties. Each voyage is a ship with 2000 holes - each hole is only visible when the boat is in water.
Related Quote Cards
Startup Lingos To The Point
How to turn an interest into a money maker. How to attract people, how to stimulate people to pay, how to make profit, how to make relations, how to keep relations.
How much do I have to give my audience so they can pay me something in return? What do they value? what problem do they search for answers on your own? I want to solve that problem.
Brand means name recognition. A lot of people knows what your company does and what you stand for. Brand is result of long campaign of consistent value provision and media cultivation. Brand helps a company reduce marketing cost.
Whether there are buyer willing to pay or not. For that to happen you must provide extreme value. The entire startup process would be based on guess before the validation. Validation happens in a market, not on the street.
Value is what you give customers beyond the price you charge. Value is effective solution to a problem. The price your customer pays reflects whether the problem is big for them and whether your solution is uniquely effective. Value stems from quality and detailed work.
Marketing means bring your product to the market and bring your message to your customer. Marketing is not salesmanship. Marketing is to penetrate the world of commerce through many barriers and existing networks.
Minimally viable business, or MVC, minimally viable company. A company that scrapes by, full of guess and hope and no traction and sales. When you give your customers things for free they all take it. But they never pay and you can never rent a table at the market.
Minimal viable product. A full artifact of a real product. Something that works ALL THE TIME. You can demonstrate the real effect on real people - not to sell hope. The MVP may not have certain non-essential bells and whistles, but it needs to have appeal value.
Customer is king
A business lives at the mercy of its customers. You provide your customers 10 dollars worth of value and they pay you 1 dollar, not knowing that your company only costs 99 cents to provide the item. The value is not the item - the value is what is attached to the item.
Company culture is based on a company making money. Once your workers are paid, they need to have a mission and aspiration so they are not bored everyday and make trouble in the work place.
A company valuation is cash investment divided by the percentage. As long as your story is good, the valuation will keep coming, and the investors will keeping falling into the line.
Return on investment
Investors are either behind family fortune (never work with them) or for rich clients as investment vehicle. Both need returns 2-3 times better than stock market darlings.
Having found what people want, not just what people may need. Your offering and their acceptance is sure, no longer a guess. You can provide it for profit, and you can indeed making living on it. Traction is sometimes called validation. You are no longer a theater. You have touched nature, and found cash vein.